Proof carbon dating is false
If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).Robert Whitelaw has done a very good job illustrating this theory using about 30,000 dates published in Radio Carbon over the last 40 years.Despite this she continually uses the c14 dates to create 'absolute' chronologies.She says this is ok so long as you take into account the correction factors from dendrochronology.One of the impressive points Whitewall makes is the conspicuous absence of dates between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago illustrating a great catastrophe killing off plant and animal life world wide (the flood of Noah)!I hope this helps your understanding of carbon dating.Example: wood found in a grave of known age by historically reliable documents is the standard for that time for the C14 content.This standard content of C14 can then be used for wood not associated with a historically documented date.
So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.Libby, the discoverer of the C14 dating method, was very disappointed with this problem.He understood that archaeological artifacts were readily available.by Helen Fryman Question: What about radiocarbon dating? Response: I asked several people who know about this field. (1.) C14 dating is very accurate for wood used up to about 4,000 years ago.This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age.
Search for proof carbon dating is false:
So they tested some of the ring sequences by C14 to put the sequences in the 'right' order.